A new Pull Request was created by @dinyar (Dinyar Rabady) for CMSSW_13_2_X.

It involves the following packages:

• DQM/L1TMonitor (dqm)

@syuvivida, @rvenditti, @nothingface0, @cmsbuild, @tjavaid, @antoniovagnerini can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks.
@missirol this is something you requested to watch as well.
@rappoccio, @sextonkennedy, @antoniovilela you are the release manager for this.

cms-bot commands are listed here

• Backported from Use ZDC digis in uGT DQM #43043

please test

backport of #43043

+1

Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-4adcba/35446/summary.html
COMMIT: f1c31a2
CMSSW: CMSSW_13_2_X_2023-10-26-1100/el8_amd64_gcc11
User test area: For local testing, you can use /cvmfs/cms-ci.cern.ch/week0/cms-sw/cmssw/43113/35446/install.sh to create a dev area with all the needed externals and cmssw changes.

Comparison Summary

Summary:

• You potentially removed 6 lines from the logs
• Reco comparison results: 10 differences found in the comparisons
• DQMHistoTests: Total files compared: 48
• DQMHistoTests: Total histograms compared: 3198785
• DQMHistoTests: Total failures: 6
• DQMHistoTests: Total nulls: 0
• DQMHistoTests: Total successes: 3198757
• DQMHistoTests: Total skipped: 22
• DQMHistoTests: Total Missing objects: 0
• DQMHistoSizes: Histogram memory added: 0.0 KiB( 47 files compared)
• Checked 207 log files, 159 edm output root files, 48 DQM output files
• TriggerResults: no differences found

@dinyar very sorry for our late test, only got a chance to test this PR at playback with DQM streamers of run 375631. It's not clear to me if you could see any difference in DQMGUI plots. DQM clients all ran without problems. Could you take a look of the playback DQMGUI here in case any difference could be seen in L1T workspace?
https://cmsweb.cern.ch/dqm/online-playback
Thanks!!

@dinyar very sorry for our late test, only got a chance to test this PR at playback with DQM streamers of run 375631. It's not clear to me if you could see any difference in DQMGUI plots. DQM clients all ran without problems. Could you take a look of the playback DQMGUI here in case any difference could be seen in L1T workspace? https://cmsweb.cern.ch/dqm/online-playback Thanks!!

Hi @dinyar , are you okay with the DQM GUI plots? The rest of the checks are okay to sign this PR.

Hi @syuvivida, @tjavaid,

Thanks for this! The plots indeed look good now, comparing [1] with [2], the mismatches are now gone.

Cheers,
Dinyar

[1] https://cmsweb.cern.ch/dqm/online/start?runnr=375631;dataset=/Global/Online/ALL;sampletype=online_data;filter=all;referencepos=overlay;referenceshow=customise;referencenorm=True;referenceobj1=refobj;referenceobj2=none;referenceobj3=none;referenceobj4=none;search=;striptype=object;stripruns=;stripaxis=run;stripomit=none;workspace=L1TEMU;size=M;root=L1TEMU/L1TdeStage2uGT;focus=;zoom=no;
[2] https://cmsweb.cern.ch/dqm/online-playback/start?runnr=0;dataset=/Global/Online/ALL;sampletype=live;filter=all;referencepos=overlay;referenceshow=customise;referencenorm=True;referenceobj1=refobj;referenceobj2=none;referenceobj3=none;referenceobj4=none;search=;striptype=object;stripruns=;stripaxis=run;stripomit=none;workspace=L1TEMU;size=M;root=L1TEMU/L1TdeStage2uGT;focus=;zoom=no;

+1

This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next CMSSW_13_2_X IBs (tests are also fine) and once validation in the development release cycle CMSSW_13_3_X is complete. This pull request will now be reviewed by the release team before it's merged. @rappoccio, @sextonkennedy, @antoniovilela (and backports should be raised in the release meeting by the corresponding L2)

+1